.
Feedback

RivCo Sheriff Seeks to Release Inmates, Electronically Monitor

Sheriff Stan Sniff reports to the county board of supervisors that inmates released because of jail overcrowding often don't come back for future court appearances.

Riverside County Sheriff Stan Sniff will ask the Board of Supervisors Tuesday to approve an electronic monitoring program to keep track of dozens of inmates whose release from jail would relieve overcrowding.

About 100 inmates may qualify to participate in the Secured Electronic Confinement Program, according to the sheriff's department.

A state law that went into effect on Jan. 1 makes its possible for counties to implement electronic monitoring in lieu of bail for jail inmates who have already been arraigned and spent at least 30 days in custody.

The sheriff noted in documents submitted to the board that nearly 7,000 inmates were returned to the streets last year because the county's five detention facilities -- containing around 4,000 beds -- were maxed out.

"More than 2,000 of these releases were inmates awaiting future court appearances under post-arraignment status," Sniff wrote to the board, adding that about a third of those released failed to show up to court after release.

The electronic confinement program proposed would aim to preclude that by closely supervising the criminal suspects and alerting them about upcoming court dates, officials said.

Under a two-decade-old federal court decree, the sheriff is required to have a bed for each inmate; if not, he must make space for incoming prisoners. The early releases are known as "federal kickouts."

Sheriff's officials focus on "low-level" offenders when deciding who should stay or go, according to previous testimony before the board.

Overcrowding has been exacerbated by Assembly Bill 109, according to public safety officials. Under the 2011 realignment legislation, so-called "non-serious, non-violent" offenders convicted of felonies that do not stem from a sex crime are to serve their sentences in local detention facilities. Proponents of realignment suggested that local jail sentences would be capped at three years, but that has not held true.

Some convicts in local correctional facilities are serving terms in excess of 10 years.

The Secured Electronic Confinement Program would entail attaching ankle bracelets with GPS tracking devices to inmates, who would be subject to weekly compliance checks and required to abide by three-dozen terms and conditions as part of their release from jail.

They would effectively still be in custody, though living at home, similar to an individual sentenced to home detention.

Before an inmate can be accepted into the program, he or she would have to fill out an eight-page application that includes employment verification or whether the individual will be attending school, including court-ordered classes.

The program is expected to actually make, rather than cost, money for the department, as those approved to take part would have to pay a $90 application fee, plus $10 a day for 30 days, documents indicate.

Application fees could generate an additional $26,520 in revenue to the sheriff's department, officials estimated in paperwork given to the board. 

Follow Palm Desert Patch on Twitter and Facebook, and sign up for the free daily newsletter here.

 

--City News Service contributed to this report.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Palm Desert Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
B.K. Holthaus May 16, 2013 at 06:05 pm
You';re welcome, Renee but I don't really expect thanks for my contributions to the classroom. IRead More wasn't going to stand by and see kids not have the basic things they needed to get through the class and most teachers are of the same mind :) Sadly, school budgets have never covered all the needs in classrooms.
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 16, 2013 at 02:15 pm
@B.K.-- Thank you for your help with the community :) I have a great respect for all teachers!
B.K. Holthaus May 16, 2013 at 12:56 pm
I was a teacher for 30 years. There was not ONEschool year when I didn't personally pay for schoolRead More supplies for my students ($500-$1,500 a yr)
Eye on the Desert March 3, 2013 at 11:26 pm
Well said, Linda.
linda hanna March 3, 2013 at 10:01 pm
Dorothy you actually believe criminals can't get guns without a background check. Wow are youRead More naive. Just because YOU don't understand why some people want a particular weapon...does not mean you can impose your ownership standards on someone else. Suppose I suggest you don't need the particular car you drive or the particlar beverage you drink? I see you are opposed to hunting. How do you feel about abortion? Typical liberal double standard at play here??
linda hanna March 3, 2013 at 09:57 pm
Totally agree. This is just the beginning of a gun grab. All it will accomplish is furtherRead More restrictions on law abiding citizens. Chicago is a perfect example. Strictest gun control in the nation and highest gun crime and murder rate. Criminals do not comply with the law. Only legal citizens will lose their rights to own the weapon of their choice. Liberals are all about choice when it comes to killing an unborn, but when it comes to a lawful gunowner's choice it's a different story altogether.