.
Feedback

Bill Aims To Add California To 'National Popular Vote' Movement

The legislation introduced this week would award Electoral College votes to the presidential candidate who wins the most votes nationwide.

In an effort to force presidential candidates to court California voters instead of focusing on battleground states, Assemblymen Jerry Hill, D-San Mateo, and Brian Nestande, R-Palm Desert, introduced Assembly Bill 459 this week.

The legislation calls for awarding all of the state's 55 electoral votes to whichever candidate wins a majority of the popular vote nationally.

“This isn’t a Republican or a Democratic issue, it’s a California issue,’’ Nestande said. “This is a way to make sure California is a relevant state in presidential politics instead of just a fundraising stop."

If adopted, the legislation would end the state’s winner-take-all policy of awarding its 55 electoral votes.

Hill said the bill would make sure candidates come to California.

“Candidates do not run television advertisements in California, they do not send direct mail, make phone calls or conduct field operations here, but they sure do a lot of fund raising here,’’ Hill said.

The National Popular Vote legislation has already been adopted by seven states and is under consideration across the country, according to both lawmakers.

AB 459 would remain inactive until enough states join the movement to ensure that a majority of electoral votes -- 270 -- would go to the presidential contender who wins a majority of the popular vote nationwide, according to Nestande’s office.

In four out of 56 presidential elections, a candidate has been elected without having the highest number of popular votes, according to Nestande.  

Article I and Amendment 12 of the U.S. Constitution require that electors be appointed in each state -- in proportion to the number of representatives -- for the purpose of choosing a president and vice president. The electors are generally obligated to follow the will of the state's voters, but don't always.   

The California Legislature approved National Popular Vote bills in 2006 and 2008, but Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed both of them.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Palm Desert Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
B.K. Holthaus May 16, 2013 at 06:05 pm
You';re welcome, Renee but I don't really expect thanks for my contributions to the classroom. IRead More wasn't going to stand by and see kids not have the basic things they needed to get through the class and most teachers are of the same mind :) Sadly, school budgets have never covered all the needs in classrooms.
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 16, 2013 at 02:15 pm
@B.K.-- Thank you for your help with the community :) I have a great respect for all teachers!
B.K. Holthaus May 16, 2013 at 12:56 pm
I was a teacher for 30 years. There was not ONEschool year when I didn't personally pay for schoolRead More supplies for my students ($500-$1,500 a yr)
Eye on the Desert March 3, 2013 at 11:26 pm
Well said, Linda.
linda hanna March 3, 2013 at 10:01 pm
Dorothy you actually believe criminals can't get guns without a background check. Wow are youRead More naive. Just because YOU don't understand why some people want a particular weapon...does not mean you can impose your ownership standards on someone else. Suppose I suggest you don't need the particular car you drive or the particlar beverage you drink? I see you are opposed to hunting. How do you feel about abortion? Typical liberal double standard at play here??
linda hanna March 3, 2013 at 09:57 pm
Totally agree. This is just the beginning of a gun grab. All it will accomplish is furtherRead More restrictions on law abiding citizens. Chicago is a perfect example. Strictest gun control in the nation and highest gun crime and murder rate. Criminals do not comply with the law. Only legal citizens will lose their rights to own the weapon of their choice. Liberals are all about choice when it comes to killing an unborn, but when it comes to a lawful gunowner's choice it's a different story altogether.