.
Feedback

UPDATE: Supervisors Approve Pension Plan Changes

New changes to pension plans to save Riverside County over $200 million over 10 years

This story was last updated at 1:40 p.m.

Riverside County supervisors today formally approved pension reforms expected to save the county millions of dollars annually by lowering formulas for new hires and having all employees make contributions toward their own retirement plans.

In a 4-0 vote -- with Supervisor Jeff Stone on vacation -- the Board of

Supervisors adopted an ordinance authorizing an amendment to the county's
contract with the California Public Employees' Retirement System, or CalPERS.
Tentative approval was given on June 19, when the matter was debated.
Board members included today's action in a block motion, ratifying several dozen policy agenda items at the same time without comment.

Under the amended CalPERS compact, a second-tier pension plan will be
established for public safety workers hired after Aug. 16. The new hires'
pensions will be based on a 2-percent-at-50 formula, meaning compensation will be determined based on 2 percent of the average of the three highest-paid years of an employee's career with the county, multiplied by the number of years on the job.

Safety workers have to be employed for at least five years and must be
50 years old to start collecting benefits. Those who remain on the job beyond
age 50 become eligible for a 2.7-percent-at-55 pension and can receive up to 90 percent of their final year's full-time compensation.

Non-public safety, or "miscellaneous,'' employees hired on or after Aug. 16 will receive pensions based on a 2-percent-at-60 formula.

The reduced retirement benefits will net the county around $206 million
in savings over a decade, according to the county Executive Office. Existing
employees' tier one benefits will remain unchanged: 3 percent at 50 for public
safety, and 3 percent at 60 for miscellaneous employees, who include clerks,
technicians, accountants and nurses.

The largest savings will be realized after all county employees begin
paying their full share of member contributions into CalPERS. So-called
"employer-paid member contributions'' have been a taxpayer expense since the
early 2000s.

For miscellaneous workers, the contribution amount equals 8 percent of gross earnings, and for safety workers, it's 9 percent. That's on top of the county's matching contributions.

According to the Executive Office, by shifting the employer-paid member
contributions to workers, the county will save up to $650 million over 10
years. The county's unfunded pension liability, as of March, is just under $800
million.

Since 2010, the Executive Office has successfully negotiated collective
bargaining agreements with unions representing more than 16,000 workers to
establish the new retirement formulas for incoming workers and have all
employees cover their own monthly pension contributions to CalPERS. The changes to EPMC will be phased in over the next two years.

Last month, Sheriff Stan Sniff objected to modifying the public safety
element of the pension system, arguing it would hamper recruitment efforts and discourage experienced law enforcement officers from staying.

"You risk turning this agency into a training ground,'' Sniff said.  "People will come to work for us and then fly off to other agencies for better benefits.''

The board consensus, however, was that with neighboring counties
offering largely identical retirement benefits, an exodus from the sheriff's
department was unlikely. However, the board agreed to consider incentives
packages in the future if recruitment problems crop up.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Palm Desert Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
B.K. Holthaus May 16, 2013 at 06:05 pm
You';re welcome, Renee but I don't really expect thanks for my contributions to the classroom. IRead More wasn't going to stand by and see kids not have the basic things they needed to get through the class and most teachers are of the same mind :) Sadly, school budgets have never covered all the needs in classrooms.
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 16, 2013 at 02:15 pm
@B.K.-- Thank you for your help with the community :) I have a great respect for all teachers!
B.K. Holthaus May 16, 2013 at 12:56 pm
I was a teacher for 30 years. There was not ONEschool year when I didn't personally pay for schoolRead More supplies for my students ($500-$1,500 a yr)
Eye on the Desert March 3, 2013 at 11:26 pm
Well said, Linda.
linda hanna March 3, 2013 at 10:01 pm
Dorothy you actually believe criminals can't get guns without a background check. Wow are youRead More naive. Just because YOU don't understand why some people want a particular weapon...does not mean you can impose your ownership standards on someone else. Suppose I suggest you don't need the particular car you drive or the particlar beverage you drink? I see you are opposed to hunting. How do you feel about abortion? Typical liberal double standard at play here??
linda hanna March 3, 2013 at 09:57 pm
Totally agree. This is just the beginning of a gun grab. All it will accomplish is furtherRead More restrictions on law abiding citizens. Chicago is a perfect example. Strictest gun control in the nation and highest gun crime and murder rate. Criminals do not comply with the law. Only legal citizens will lose their rights to own the weapon of their choice. Liberals are all about choice when it comes to killing an unborn, but when it comes to a lawful gunowner's choice it's a different story altogether.