.
Feedback

Supervisors to Approve Balanced County Budget

Spending cuts and pension reform bring RivCo budget out of the red

Riverside County supervisors are expected today to formally approve a balanced 2012-13 fiscal year budget, though county officials cautioned that uncertainties ahead will make conservative spending a must.

"The final 2012/13 budget reflects discretionary revenue that is below
11/12 levels,'' according to a county Executive Office report.  "We cannot rely

on revenue growth to balance this year's budget and, instead, must keep
spending in line with available revenue.''

The Board of Supervisors in June tentatively approved a budget blueprint
that outlined a structurally balanced budget founded on spending cuts,
consolidation and pension reform. More than 130 employees were laid off,
according to county CEO Jay Orr.

As in previous years, the Executive Office recommended that the board
postpone formal ratification of the budget to September to give county analysts
time to measure the impact of the state's budgetary plans and to adjust data in
response to Assessor-Clerk-Recorder Larry Ward's release of the fiscal year
property tax assessment roll.

The roll indicated residential and commercial property values countywide
were relatively flat, assuring the county would not suffer a precipitous loss
in property taxes.

According to the budget report, cuts aimed at closing the state's $16
billion deficit would affect court operations, but most county agencies would
be spared losses.

In a preface to the budget, Orr noted that the region appeared to be on
track for an "extended recovery'' but cautioned that spending challenges in
the form of increased labor costs tied to collective bargaining agreements
approved over the last year would pose "financial challenges'' for the county
in the months ahead.

Documents showed the county would have about $40 million in cash in the
first quarter of the fiscal year, which began July 1. County officials said
planned reductions should move ahead, including a $100,000 spending cut in the Office of the Registrar of Voters that will result in two positions being
slashed.

The Department of Code Enforcement and the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System office will absorb about a $1.8 million cut, while the
Department of Public Social Services, which receives the bulk of its revenue
from the state and federal governments, is expected to save the county about
$1.8 million via internal reforms and lower-than-anticipated caseloads.
The Executive Office listed organizational restructuring, departmental
consolidation, jail construction and ``business-friendly'' reforms as among
county government's priorities in the current fiscal year.

Appropriations for 2012-13 total $4.67 billion, compared to $5.1 billion
in 2011-12, about a 9 percent drop. Those expenditures are covered through
federal and state ``pass-through'' funds, county discretionary money and
revenue from special districts.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Palm Desert Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
B.K. Holthaus May 16, 2013 at 06:05 pm
You';re welcome, Renee but I don't really expect thanks for my contributions to the classroom. IRead More wasn't going to stand by and see kids not have the basic things they needed to get through the class and most teachers are of the same mind :) Sadly, school budgets have never covered all the needs in classrooms.
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 16, 2013 at 02:15 pm
@B.K.-- Thank you for your help with the community :) I have a great respect for all teachers!
B.K. Holthaus May 16, 2013 at 12:56 pm
I was a teacher for 30 years. There was not ONEschool year when I didn't personally pay for schoolRead More supplies for my students ($500-$1,500 a yr)
Eye on the Desert March 3, 2013 at 11:26 pm
Well said, Linda.
linda hanna March 3, 2013 at 10:01 pm
Dorothy you actually believe criminals can't get guns without a background check. Wow are youRead More naive. Just because YOU don't understand why some people want a particular weapon...does not mean you can impose your ownership standards on someone else. Suppose I suggest you don't need the particular car you drive or the particlar beverage you drink? I see you are opposed to hunting. How do you feel about abortion? Typical liberal double standard at play here??
linda hanna March 3, 2013 at 09:57 pm
Totally agree. This is just the beginning of a gun grab. All it will accomplish is furtherRead More restrictions on law abiding citizens. Chicago is a perfect example. Strictest gun control in the nation and highest gun crime and murder rate. Criminals do not comply with the law. Only legal citizens will lose their rights to own the weapon of their choice. Liberals are all about choice when it comes to killing an unborn, but when it comes to a lawful gunowner's choice it's a different story altogether.